Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Pedro Jesus Flores, 11-14601 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-14601 Visitors: 36
Filed: Sep. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14601 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00015-GKS-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO JESUS FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tom Dale, appointed counsel for
More
              Case: 11-14601    Date Filed: 09/17/2012   Page: 1 of 2

                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 11-14601
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00015-GKS-KRS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

PEDRO JESUS FLORES,
                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                        _________________________

                               (September 17, 2012)

Before HULL, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Pedro Jesus Flores in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 18
              Case: 11-14601    Date Filed: 09/17/2012   Page: 2 of 
2 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Flores’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer