JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
The United States and Claimants G&R Empire LLC; Phoenix Cash & Carry LLC; Raed "Roy" Mouri and Loudy Egho; George Bittar, as trustee of the Bittar Family Trust, dated December 23, 2003; George Bittar; and Ideal Tobacco Wholesale, Inc. (hereafter referred to collectively as "claimants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit the following Stipulation for Extension of Stay of Further Proceedings and Proposed Order.
This matter was previously stayed on January 8, 2009, May 20, 2009, September 10, 2009, March 5, 2010, July 2, 2010, January 7, 2011, May 25, 2011, November 30, 2011, March 1, 2012, and May 25, 2012, based on the on-going criminal investigation against Phoenix Cash & Carry LLC, G&R Empire LLC, Ideal Tobacco Wholesale, Inc., Raed Mouri, and George Bittar. The parties state as follows to support a further stay in the case:
1. Each of the claimants has filed a claim to the defendant property, but have not yet filed their Answers and will not be required to do so until the stay contemplated by this stipulation expires.
2. A further stay is requested pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and 981(g)(2). The United States contends that Raed Mouri and George Bittar and others were involved in a scheme to defraud the California Board of Equalization out of excise taxes due on the sale of tobacco products. The United States further contends that Mouri, Bittar, and others used the U.S. mail to execute the fraud scheme, and that the proceeds of the scheme are traceable to the seized tobacco products and to the bank accounts from which the defendant funds were seized. The United States further contends that the defendant funds were involved in money laundering transactions. Raed Mouri and George Bittar deny these allegations.
3. To date no one has been charged with any criminal offense by state, local, or federal authorities, and it is the United State's position that the statute of limitations has not expired on potential criminal charges relating to the fraud scheme. Nevertheless, the United States intends to depose claimants Mouri and Bittar regarding their claims, their ownership and/or management of Phoenix Cash & Carry LLC, G&R Empire LLC, Ideal Tobacco Wholesale, Inc., and their involvement in the sale of tobacco products into California. If discovery proceeds at this time, claimants will be placed in the difficult position of either invoking their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and losing the ability to pursue their claims to the defendant property, or waiving their Fifth Amendment rights and submitting to a deposition and potentially incriminating themselves. If they invoke their Fifth Amendment rights, the United States will be deprived of the ability to explore the factual basis for the claims they filed with this court.
4. In addition, claimants intend to depose, among others, the agents involved with this investigation, including but not limited to the agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives and the California Board of Equalization. Allowing depositions of the law enforcement officers at this time would adversely affect the ability of the federal authorities to investigate the alleged underlying criminal conduct.
5. The parties recognize that proceeding with these actions at this time has potential adverse effects on the investigation of the underlying criminal conduct and/or upon the claimants' ability to prove their claim to the property and to assert any defenses to forfeiture. For these reasons, the parties jointly request that these matters be stayed until December 6, 2012, in accordance with the terms of this stipulation. At that time the parties will advise the court of the status of the criminal investigation, if any, and will advise the court whether a further stay is necessary.
For the reasons set forth above, these matters are stayed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and 981(g)(2) until December 6, 2012, in accordance with the terms of this stipulation. On or before December 6, 2012, the parties will advise the court whether a further stay is necessary.