Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Phoenix Technologies Ltd. v. VMware, Inc., 15-cv-01414-HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160613b07 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY CERTAIN EXPERT REPORT AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Phoenix Technologies Ltd. ("Phoenix") and VMware, Inc. ("VMware") (collectively, the "Parties") file this joint stipulation requesting that the Court issue an Order modifying certain deadlines relating to expert discovery. WHEREAS, VMware's rebuttal damages report d
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY CERTAIN EXPERT REPORT AND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Phoenix Technologies Ltd. ("Phoenix") and VMware, Inc. ("VMware") (collectively, the "Parties") file this joint stipulation requesting that the Court issue an Order modifying certain deadlines relating to expert discovery.

WHEREAS, VMware's rebuttal damages report deadline is June 10, 2016 (Dkt. No. 89);

WHEREAS, Phoenix's reply damages report deadline is June 27, 2016 (Id.);

WHEREAS, the deadline for expert discovery is July 8, 2016 (Id.);

WHEREAS, per Civil Local Rule 37-3, the last day on which the Parties can file a motion to compel expert discovery is July 15, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to a short extension of these deadlines to accommodate the parties' and certain experts' schedules;

NOW, THEREFORE, Parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following deadlines:

• The deadline for VMware's rebuttal damages report is continued from June 10, 2016 to June 13, 2016; • The deadline for Phoenix's reply damages report is continued from June 27, 2016 to June 30, 2016; • The deadline for expert discovery is continued from July 8, 2016 to July 15, 2016; and • The deadline for filing a motion to compel expert discovery is continued from July 15, 2016 to July 22, 2016.

The Parties submit that the schedule modification proposed above would not change any other deadlines in this case or for the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer