Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170908929 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Synnex Corporation ("Synnex") and Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp. (collectively "BenQ"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to BenQ with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does no
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff Synnex Corporation ("Synnex") and Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp. (collectively "BenQ"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to BenQ with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Synnex against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FILER ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer