UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. ST. ANSELM EXPLORATION CO., 11-cv-00668-REB-MJW. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120522c81
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 21, 2012
Latest Update: May 21, 2012
Summary: COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge. HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 8:40 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also on the conference call for Plaintiff is Dugan Bliss. The Court raises Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Against St. Anselm Exploration Co. [Docket No. 93] for argument. Argument by Barbara Wells on behalf of Plaintiff. Response by Thomas Birge on behalf of his client defendant. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's S
Summary: COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge. HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 8:40 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also on the conference call for Plaintiff is Dugan Bliss. The Court raises Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Against St. Anselm Exploration Co. [Docket No. 93] for argument. Argument by Barbara Wells on behalf of Plaintiff. Response by Thomas Birge on behalf of his client defendant. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's SE..
More
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge.
HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 8:40 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also on the conference call for Plaintiff is Dugan Bliss.
The Court raises Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Against St. Anselm Exploration Co. [Docket No. 93] for argument.
Argument by Barbara Wells on behalf of Plaintiff.
Response by Thomas Birge on behalf of his client defendant.
It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL AGAINST ST. ANSELM EXPLORATION CO. [Docket No. 93, filed May 15, 2012] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. No sanctions are entered at this time.
Parties shall meet and confer regarding the defendant's interrogatory response submitted last week. Defendant St. Anselm Exploration Co. shall provide supplements to its response to Plaintiff's interrogatory number three on or before MAY 23, 2012.
Source: Leagle
