FONSECA v. TARGET CORPORATION, 2:16-cv-861 R(SSx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160823528
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND [Filed Concurrently with STIPULATION TO REMAND] MANUEL L. REAL , District Judge . Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff EVA FONSECA and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff EVA FONSECA as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint: Eva Fonseca v. Target Corporation, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC604409 has incurred
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND [Filed Concurrently with STIPULATION TO REMAND] MANUEL L. REAL , District Judge . Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff EVA FONSECA and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff EVA FONSECA as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint: Eva Fonseca v. Target Corporation, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC604409 has incurred ..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND
[Filed Concurrently with STIPULATION TO REMAND]
MANUEL L. REAL, District Judge.
Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff EVA FONSECA and Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, and good cause appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff EVA FONSECA as a result of the alleged incident and subsequent claim all described more fully in the Complaint: Eva Fonseca v. Target Corporation, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC604409 has incurred damages, if any, that should not exceed, $75,000. Accordingly, this case does not meet the federal jurisdictional requirements as defined in 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) and the case is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
Source: Leagle
