Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bilbo v. County of Alameda, 3:17-cv-00932-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181211814 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, by and through themselves and their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all defendants, each side to bear its/his/her own fees and costs, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS SO STIPULATED. ATTORNEY ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures fo
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, by and through themselves and their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all defendants, each side to bear its/his/her own fees and costs, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature ("/s/") within this E-filed document or have been authorized by plaintiff to show his signature on this document as/s/.

Dated: December 10, 2018. By: /s/Michael C. Wenzel Michael C. Wenzel

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation of Plaintiff Pamela Saucer Bilbo and Defendants County of Alameda and JP Williams, this Court dismisses the action of Pamela Saucer Bilbo v. County of Alameda et al. in its entirety as to all defendants with prejudice, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The order to show cause, ECF No. 87, is terminated as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer