Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MULLEN v. COLVIN, 4:16-cv-00848-KAW (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160803839 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 1, 2016 to September 15, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant needs this extension due to her attorney's inordinately
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from August 1, 2016 to September 15, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant needs this extension due to her attorney's inordinately heavy caseload through July and August 2016. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time to respond to Plaintiff's arguments.

The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions shall be extended accordingly.

The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer