Anaya v. Berryhill, 18-300 GJF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20180705f44
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE GREGORY J. FOURATT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court for scheduling and IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: (1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand to Administrative Agency with Supporting Memorandum on or before September 7, 2018 ; (2) Defendant shall file a Response on or before November 9, 2018 ; (3) Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before November 23, 2018 ; (4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall
Summary: ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE GREGORY J. FOURATT , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court for scheduling and IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: (1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand to Administrative Agency with Supporting Memorandum on or before September 7, 2018 ; (2) Defendant shall file a Response on or before November 9, 2018 ; (3) Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before November 23, 2018 ; (4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall c..
More
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
GREGORY J. FOURATT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court for scheduling and IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
(1) Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse or Remand to Administrative Agency with Supporting Memorandum on or before September 7, 2018;
(2) Defendant shall file a Response on or before November 9, 2018;
(3) Plaintiff may file a Reply on or before November 23, 2018;
(4) All supporting memoranda filed pursuant to this Order shall cite the transcript or record in support of assertions of fact and shall cite authority1 in support of propositions of law; and
(5) All requests for extensions of time altering the deadlines set in this Order shall be made through a motion to the Court. If the parties concur in seeking an extension of time, they shall submit a stipulated proposed order to the Court for approval.
FootNotes
1. Citation of unpublished opinions must be in accordance with Tenth Circuit Rule 32.1.
Source: Leagle
