Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Aaron Jackson v. Miami-Dade County, 11-13293 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-13293 Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-13293 Date Filed: 11/02/2012 Page: 1 of 4 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13293 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-23134-FAM AARON JACKSON, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllPlaintiff-Appellant, versus MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Political Subdivision, MIAMI-DADE CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, TIMOTHY RYAN, Director of Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation, MARYDELL GUEVARA, Deputy Director of Miami-Dade Corrections
More
                    Case: 11-13293       Date Filed: 11/02/2012   Page: 1 of 4

                                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]


                      IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                     ________________________

                                           No. 11-13293
                                       Non-Argument Calendar
                                     ________________________

                                D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-23134-FAM

AARON JACKSON,

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll                                   llllllPlaintiff-Appellant,

                                               versus

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Political Subdivision, MIAMI-DADE
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, TIMOTHY RYAN, Director of
Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation, MARYDELL GUEVARA, Deputy
Director of Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation,

                                                                     Defendants-Appellees.

                                     ________________________

                           Appeal from the United States District Court
                               for the Southern District of Florida
                                 ________________________

                                        (November 2, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 11-13293    Date Filed: 11/02/2012   Page: 2 of 4

      This is a retaliation suit brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a)

against Miami-Dade County by Aaron Jackson, a lieutenant with the County’s

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. After he was denied a promotion

to the position of Correctional Captain in 2004, Jackson filed a complaint with the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) claiming that he was

denied the promotion on account of his race, black. Jackson did not pursue the

claim and continued on in his employment.

      The seeds for the present litigation were planted in July 2007, when the

Department posted a vacancy in the Correctional Captain position. Jackson knew

of the posting but did not apply. The Department posted a vacancy in the

Correctional Captain position again in 2009. As before, Jackson, who lacked a

bachelor’s degree, one of the requirements for the position, did not apply. In any

event, the posting was withdrawn because the bachelor’s degree requirement had

not been approved by the County’s Human Resource (“HR”) department. HR

subsequently approved the requirement, however, and the job was reposted, in

February 2010. Jackson, still lacking a bachelor’s degree, did not apply. A few

days later, he filed a charge with the EEOC, claiming that the Department

retaliated against him in 2007, 2009 and 2010 for filing the EEOC charge in 2005

by adding a bachelor’s degree job requirement for the Correctional Captain

                                         2
                 Case: 11-13293     Date Filed: 11/02/2012        Page: 3 of 4

position.1 After receiving his right-to-sue letter, he brought this lawsuit.

      Following discovery, the Department moved the District Court for summary

judgment. The court granted its motion. In its dispositive order entered on June

30, 2011, the court found that Jackson’s claim failed because he had not applied

for any of the positions and, had he applied, he would not have been chosen

because he lacked a bachelor’s degree. Moreover, the 2007 failure-to-promote

claim was time-barred, and the 2010 claim was barred because his 2010 EEOC

charge failed to allege that the bachelor’s-degree requirement in the 2010 posting

      1
          The charge stated:

      I believe that I have been retaliated against by the department and by Marydell
      Guevara (Deputy Director) because I filed an EEOC charge against Respondent in
      2005 alleging failure to promote because of my race, black.

      In 2005, Susan Torrienta assured me that the promotion process would be changed.
      Shortly thereafter, Deputy Director Marydell Guevara (Hispanic) made the statement
      that as long she was Deputy, I would never be promoted to Correctional Captain
      since that time.

      In 2007 and September 2009, Respondent’s job announcement for the Correctional
      Captain position stated that applicants must have a bachelor’s degree. I do not have
      a bachelor’s degree and did not apply for the position. In September 2009, I
      learned that Respondent did not have approval to change the qualifications for the
      Correctional Captain position by listing bachelor’s degree as a requirement.
      This was verified by Linda Webber in the compensation department and the 2009
      job announcement was withdrawn.

      I have served as Acting Correctional Captain on many occasions and I am
     qualified for the position. I believe that the job requirement for the
     Correctional Captain position was changed from the 2000 version (which did
     not require a bachelor’s degree) in an effort to prevent me from being promoted.



                                               3
               Case: 11-13293     Date Filed: 11/02/2012    Page: 4 of 4

was in retaliation for his 2005 EEOC charge. Jackson now appeals, arguing that

he established a prima facie case of retaliation sufficient to carry his case to a jury.

For the reasons stated in the District Court’s June 30, 2011 order, we find no merit

in his argument.

      AFFIRMED.




                                           4

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer