Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CANNON v. KEOLIS TRANSIT AMERICA, INC., 2:14-cv-01983-JCM-CWH. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160119c73 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MICHAEL CANNON, JOHN STARKS, AND DANIEL VARGAS' DISCRIMINATORY TERMINATION CLAIMS JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Defendant Veolia Transpiration Services, Inc. which is now known as Transdev North America, Inc. (hereinafter "Veolia") and Plaintiffs Michael Cannon, John Starks, and Daniel Vargas (hereinafter collectively, "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation and order dismissing certain c
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MICHAEL CANNON, JOHN STARKS, AND DANIEL VARGAS' DISCRIMINATORY TERMINATION CLAIMS

Defendant Veolia Transpiration Services, Inc. which is now known as Transdev North America, Inc. (hereinafter "Veolia") and Plaintiffs Michael Cannon, John Starks, and Daniel Vargas (hereinafter collectively, "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation and order dismissing certain claims and defenses with prejudice.

Plaintiffs hereby stipulate and agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of any and all claims asserted against Veolia that Veolia was responsible for Plaintiffs not being hired for the Sunset and Simmons service contracts, which Veolia lost to Keolis Transit America, Inc. (hereinafter "Keolis") and MV Transportation, Inc. (hereinafter "MV") respectively, on or about July 7, 2013 (hereinafter, "Dismissed Claims").

Defendant Veolia hereby stipulates and agrees to waive any claim for fees and costs arising out of or related to the above referenced Dismissed Claims.

Plaintiffs do not waive or dismiss any claims against Veolia relating to them not being hired by Veolia for the SuperShuttle contract or the Para-Transit contract, both of which were obtained by Veolia after they lost the Sunset and Simmons service contracts. Defendant Veolia further stipulates and agrees to waive any arguments that it might have, that Plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies with respect to not being hired for the SuperShuttle or Para-Transit contracts.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer