Hill v. Kernan, 2:19-cv-0184 TLN DB P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190227b52
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The action was originally filed in state court and was removed by defendants. Defendants request they be permitted to file a response to the first amended complaint ("FAC") after the court has screened that complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' request (ECF No. 8) is granted. Defendants' responsive pleading
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The action was originally filed in state court and was removed by defendants. Defendants request they be permitted to file a response to the first amended complaint ("FAC") after the court has screened that complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' request (ECF No. 8) is granted. Defendants' responsive pleading s..
More
ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action was originally filed in state court and was removed by defendants. Defendants request they be permitted to file a response to the first amended complaint ("FAC") after the court has screened that complaint under 28 U.S.C. §1915A.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' request (ECF No. 8) is granted. Defendants' responsive pleading shall be due after the court screens the FAC.
Source: Leagle
