Filed: Nov. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-15599 Date Filed: 11/16/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15599 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00363-SDM-TBM-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARNALDO TORRES MIRANDA, l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 16, 2012) Before
Summary: Case: 11-15599 Date Filed: 11/16/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15599 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00363-SDM-TBM-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARNALDO TORRES MIRANDA, l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 16, 2012) Before ..
More
Case: 11-15599 Date Filed: 11/16/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15599
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00363-SDM-TBM-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARNALDO TORRES MIRANDA,
l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 16, 2012)
Before WILSON, ANDERSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 11-15599 Date Filed: 11/16/2012 Page: 2 of 2
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Arnaldo Torres Miranda in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miranda’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2