Filed: Nov. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-11511 Date Filed: 11/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-11511 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00053-RH-WCS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRIN ARNEZ PRESTON, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 19, 2012) Before
Summary: Case: 12-11511 Date Filed: 11/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-11511 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00053-RH-WCS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRIN ARNEZ PRESTON, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 19, 2012) Before C..
More
Case: 12-11511 Date Filed: 11/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-11511
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00053-RH-WCS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRIN ARNEZ PRESTON,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(November 19, 2012)
Before CARNES, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-11511 Date Filed: 11/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2
Chet Kaufman, Assistant Federal Public Defender and appellate counsel for
Cedrin Arnez Preston in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Preston’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2