Schilling v. JPMorgan Chase, 2:17-cv-00060-RSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20170321e77
Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Based upon the Stipulation of the undersigned Parties and the Court having reviewed the file and records herein, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. The Motion for Stipulated Order staying any further litigation (including the deadlines for initial disclosures, the Joint Report and meetings required under FRCP Rule 16 and 26) in this proceeding until 90-days after the Cour
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Based upon the Stipulation of the undersigned Parties and the Court having reviewed the file and records herein, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. The Motion for Stipulated Order staying any further litigation (including the deadlines for initial disclosures, the Joint Report and meetings required under FRCP Rule 16 and 26) in this proceeding until 90-days after the Court..
More
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
Based upon the Stipulation of the undersigned Parties and the Court having reviewed the file and records herein, NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1. The Motion for Stipulated Order staying any further litigation (including the deadlines for initial disclosures, the Joint Report and meetings required under FRCP Rule 16 and 26) in this proceeding until 90-days after the Court issues a ruling on JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Docket 16) is granted while the Court considers the Motion. The Court will postpone the filing of the FRCP Rule 26/26 Joint Report currently due on March 27, 2017 and re-set the deadline for a date at least 90-days after it issues a ruling on JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss. All other dates will be re-set accordingly as provided in the FRCP.
2. To the extent JPMorgan Chase & Co. is named as a defendant, it is dismissed with prejudice and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is the proper defendant.
Source: Leagle
