Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KYUNG CHO v. UCBH HOLDINGS, INC., CV-09-4208-JSW (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110311c27 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 11, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2011
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws ("CAC") on August 10, 2010. WHEREAS, all but one of the individual Defendants who have been served with summons in this matter (excluding Defendants who have been dismissed) filed motions to dismiss the CAC on November 19, 2010, which
More

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR [PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws ("CAC") on August 10, 2010.

WHEREAS, all but one of the individual Defendants who have been served with summons in this matter (excluding Defendants who have been dismissed) filed motions to dismiss the CAC on November 19, 2010, which motions were noticed to be heard on February 18, 2011. Defendant John Cinderey has been served and has not responded to the complaint.

WHEREAS, this Court entered an Order on February 16, 2011 vacating the hearing on Defendants' motions to dismiss. Said motions remain under submission as of the filing of this stipulation.

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference is scheduled to take place on March 18, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.

WHEREAS, there is currently a stay of discovery pending the Court's decisions on the motions to dismiss,

WHEREAS, the joint case management conference statement is dependent on the date and content of the decisions on the motions to dismiss,

WHEREAS, Defendants' counsel have conferred with counsel for E. Lynn Schoenmann, Chapter 7 Trustee of UCBH Holdings, Inc. (as to which this matter is currently stayed), and the Trustee does not object to this Stipulation.

THEREFORE, to allow time for the pending motions to dismiss to be resolved, the parties hereby STIPULATE, AND JOINTLY REQUEST THE COURT TO APPROVE that the Case Management Conference be continued to May 6, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 18, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. is continued to May 6, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer