welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, D. Nevada
  4. 2020
  5. United States v. Juarez, 2:16-cr-00265-GMN-NJK. (2020)

United States v. Juarez, 2:16-cr-00265-GMN-NJK. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200304d05 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Order Setting Hearing (Docket Nos. 2119, 2142) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On February 24, 2020, Defendant John Chrispin Juarez filed a motion to reopen his detention hearing, which is fully briefed. Docket Nos. 2119, 2127, 2129, 2132. 2 On March 3, 2020, however, the parties filed a stipulation requesting a reopened detention hearing. Docket No. 2142. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulation. Docket No. 2142. The Court SETS a reopened detention hearing for Marc
More

Order Setting Hearing

(Docket Nos. 2119, 2142)

On February 24, 2020, Defendant John Chrispin Juarez filed a motion to reopen his detention hearing, which is fully briefed. Docket Nos. 2119, 2127, 2129, 2132.2 On March 3, 2020, however, the parties filed a stipulation requesting a reopened detention hearing. Docket No. 2142.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties' stipulation. Docket No. 2142. The Court SETS a reopened detention hearing for March 10, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3C. The Court DENIES Defendant's motion to reopen his detention hearing, Docket No. 2119, as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. On August 6, 2019, the instant case was reassigned to the undersigned and the Court ordered that "[a]ll further documents must bear the correct case number 2:16-cr-00265-GMN-NJK." Docket No. 1769 (emphasis in original). Despite this order, counsel used the incorrect case number in filing the instant documents. Docket Nos. 2119, 2127, 2132, 2134, 2142. Counsel is again ORDERED to use the correct case number in all filings.
2. Defendant repeatedly calls the judge who issued the original detention order a "magistrate." Docket No. 2132 at 3, 4. Judge Rosenbluth is not a "magistrate" and, indeed, there have been no "magistrates" in the federal system for more than a quarter century. See, e.g., Taddeo v. American Invsco Corp., 2015 WL 751072, *2 n.2 (D. Nev. Feb. 20, 2015) (discussing Williams v. City of Mesa, 2010 WL 2803880, *2 n.1 (D. Ariz. July 15, 2010)). When parties choose to use titles in filings before this Court, the Court expects them to use correct titles.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
2:16-cr-00265-GMN-NJK.
Counsels
  • Paola M. Armeni
  • Telia U. Williams
  • Lance A. Maningo
  • Thomas A. Ericsson
  • Richard E. Tanasi
  • Joshua Tomsheck
  • Chris T. Rasmussen
  • John G. George
  • Janice Anne Hubbard
  • Loren Graham
  • Lance J. Hendron
  • Theresa A. Ristenpart
  • Karen A. Connolly
  • Christopher D. Baker
  • Daniel Schiess
  • David N. Karpel
  • John Han
  • Tracey Batson Geer
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer