TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
The parties have been working diligently toward moving this case forward in an efficient, expeditious manner. The parties wish to litigate this matter in a cost effective manner and avoid unnecessary attorney fees and costs.
The parties have identified key legal issues that are suited for resolution on cross motions for summary judgment. The parties wish to minimize their respective costs for expert witnesses until after the cross motions for summary judgment have been resolved by the Court.
The parties expect to file their respective cross motions for summary judgment at least eight weeks in advance of April 24, 2014, which is an open hearing date according to the Court's website. The parties intend to designate April 24, 2014 as the hearing date for the cross motions.
Pursuant to the Court's September 4, 2013 Order on the parties' Stipulation Re: Change In Scheduling Order (Dkt 30), expert disclosures currently are scheduled for February 7, 2014. For the reasons set forth above, the parties have agreed to submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order continuing the expert disclosure deadline to May 16, 2014.
The parties recognize the need to maintain compliance with the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order and online practices to afford adequate time between the applicable deadlines. The parties believe that revising the expert disclosure date as set forth above will not require the revision of any other dates or deadlines. The parties specifically have discussed the July 14, 2014 deadline to file the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, and have agreed that the changing of the expert disclosure date will not interfere with their ability to file that document in a timely manner. However, if the Court determines that other dates or deadlines need to be revised, the parties are willing to accept the Court's determination in that regard.
Based on the aforesaid Stipulation, and good cause appearing to exist,
IT IS SO ORDERED.