Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MULLEN v. COLVIN, 4:16-cv-00848-KAW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160923b73 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for 30 days from September 15, 2016 to October 17, 2016. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this extension to fur
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended for 30 days from September 15, 2016 to October 17, 2016. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this extension to further consult with client to obtain relevant information critical to Defendant's defense.

The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions shall be extended accordingly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer