Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HOVIND, 3:06cr83/MCR (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20130807899 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 11, 2013. (Doc. 456). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections t
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 11, 2013. (Doc. 456). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's Amended Motion to Vacate (doc. 454) is DISMISSED, as this court does not have jurisdiction to consider a second or successive motion absent leave from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal, and alternatively, the motion is DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer