Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Holguin v. Wicks, 1:16-cv-00346-DAD-BAM (PC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191219923 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL AS MOOT (ECF No. 93) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On September 17, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, and directed the Clerk of the Court to close this case. (ECF No. 85.) Judgment was entered accordingly the same date. (ECF No. 86.) On October 24, 2019, following an extension of time, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal.
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL AS MOOT

(ECF No. 93)

On September 17, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, and directed the Clerk of the Court to close this case. (ECF No. 85.) Judgment was entered accordingly the same date. (ECF No. 86.) On October 24, 2019, following an extension of time, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 90.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, filed December 16, 2019. (ECF No. 93.)

A review of the docket in the pending appeal reveals that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status continues on appeal. See Documents 5-7 in Case No. 19-17163 (9th Cir.). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is HEREBY DENIED as moot. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer