Wahl v. Sutton, 1:16-cv-01576-LJO-BAM (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191030e80
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECORD ON APPEAL (ECF No. 60) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On October 21, 2019, Plaintiff Peter Gerard Wahl, a former state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking a complete copy of the record on appeal. (ECF No. 60.) Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Rules, Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, is not required to file an excerpt of the record. Circuit Rule 30-1.2. Further,
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECORD ON APPEAL (ECF No. 60) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On October 21, 2019, Plaintiff Peter Gerard Wahl, a former state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking a complete copy of the record on appeal. (ECF No. 60.) Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Rules, Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, is not required to file an excerpt of the record. Circuit Rule 30-1.2. Further, ..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECORD ON APPEAL
(ECF No. 60)
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
On October 21, 2019, Plaintiff Peter Gerard Wahl, a former state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking a complete copy of the record on appeal. (ECF No. 60.)
Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Rules, Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, is not required to file an excerpt of the record. Circuit Rule 30-1.2. Further, to the extent Plaintiff is attempting to order a transcript, this request is unnecessary. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1). No proceedings in this action were transcribed. Plaintiff's motion is therefore DENIED.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff is not prevented from requesting copies of the excerpts of the record pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 30-3.
Source: Leagle
