Nino v. Saul, 18-cv-1224 SMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20191219c44
Visitors: 30
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Having denied Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing [Doc. 17], by a Memorandum Opinion and Order entered concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Andrew Saul is the current Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul should be substituted fo
Summary: JUDGMENT STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Having denied Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing [Doc. 17], by a Memorandum Opinion and Order entered concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Andrew Saul is the current Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul should be substituted for..
More
JUDGMENT
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
Having denied Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing [Doc. 17], by a Memorandum Opinion and Order entered concurrently herewith,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Andrew Saul is the current Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill as the Defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
