Coca v. Saul, 18-942 JAP/KK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20191008k03
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION JAMES A. PARKER , Senior District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa, filed September 13, 2019. (Doc. 30.) The parties have not filed any objections. The Tenth Circuit has held "that a party's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an iss
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION JAMES A. PARKER , Senior District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa, filed September 13, 2019. (Doc. 30.) The parties have not filed any objections. The Tenth Circuit has held "that a party's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issu..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
JAMES A. PARKER, Senior District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa, filed September 13, 2019. (Doc. 30.) The parties have not filed any objections. The Tenth Circuit has held "that a party's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review." U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. Id. at 1059.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 30) are adopted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand (Doc. 20) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
