Allen v. Rimbach, 1:18-cv-01653-LJO-SAB (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190705767
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S ANSWER [ECF No. 31] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Kevin Allen is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's ADA claim against Defendant Pfeiffer. On June 13, 2019, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint. On July 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed objections to Defendant's answer. Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provid
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S ANSWER [ECF No. 31] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Kevin Allen is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's ADA claim against Defendant Pfeiffer. On June 13, 2019, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint. On July 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed objections to Defendant's answer. Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide..
More
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S ANSWER
[ECF No. 31]
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Kevin Allen is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's ADA claim against Defendant Pfeiffer.
On June 13, 2019, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint.
On July 1, 2019, Plaintiff filed objections to Defendant's answer.
Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows:
There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Because the Court did not order Plaintiff to reply to Defendant's answer, Plaintiff's reply is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
