Filed: Jan. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12475 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00043-RS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GAELAN PIERRE SPRUILL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 16, 2013) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Dustin Stephenson, appointed c
Summary: Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12475 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00043-RS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GAELAN PIERRE SPRUILL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 16, 2013) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Dustin Stephenson, appointed co..
More
Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12475
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00043-RS-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GAELAN PIERRE SPRUILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(January 16, 2013)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Dustin Stephenson, appointed counsel for Gaelan Pierre Spruill in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 12-12475 Date Filed: 01/16/2013 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spruill’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2