Abeyta v. Social Security Administration, 1:17-CV-00447-kbm. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20171219b81
Visitors: 20
Filed: Dec. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND KAREN B. MOLZEN , Chief Magistrate Judge . Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through her counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commi
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND KAREN B. MOLZEN , Chief Magistrate Judge . Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through her counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commis..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND
KAREN B. MOLZEN, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through her counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner's request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.1 See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Concurrently herewith, the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58.
Source: Leagle
