Filed: Jul. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs Jay T., Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("District"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to the following: 1) On May 1
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs Jay T., Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("District"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to the following: 1) On May 16..
More
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs Jay T., Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("District"), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to the following:
1) On May 16, 2016, the parties agreed, via stipulation, to the following briefing and hearing schedule:
• Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum to be filed on or before July 22, 2016;
• District's Opposition Memorandum to be filed on or before August 19, 2016;
• Plaintiff's Reply Brief to be filed within fourteen days of filing of Opposition Brief;
• Hearing on September 22, 2016.
2) On May 17, 2016, the Court ordered the briefing and hearing schedule as proposed by the parties.
3) Because of unforeseen work obligations, and a delay in receiving the administrative record, counsel for Plaintiffs requested, and counsel for Defendant agreed, to continue the briefing and hearing schedule as follows:
• Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys' Fees (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers, shall be filed on or before August 31, 2016;
• District's Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed on or before September 30, 2016;
• Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than 14 days after the District's Opposition Memorandum is filed;
• Hearing on November 17, 2016.
4) There have been no previous modifications to the proposed briefing and hearing schedule, either by stipulation or Court order.
5) Accordingly, the parties request approval for this modification of the schedule.
ORDER
Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between Plaintiffs Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("District"), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE: The Court hereby orders the briefing and hearing schedule be continued in this action as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys' Fees (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers, shall be filed on or before August 31, 2016;
2. District's Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed on or before September 30, 2016;
3. Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than 14 days after the District's Opposition Memorandum is filed; and
4. A hearing is set for November 17, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. on the merits of the Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
