Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TORRES v. CARESCOPE LLC, 2:15-cv-0198 TLN CKD. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161209749 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on December 7, 2016. 1 Joseph Sutton appeared for plaintiff. Sharon Futerman appeared for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The motion to compel (ECF no. 17) is granted in part and denied in part. 2. The motion is denied with respect to production
More

ORDER

Plaintiff's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on December 7, 2016.1 Joseph Sutton appeared for plaintiff. Sharon Futerman appeared for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel (ECF no. 17) is granted in part and denied in part.

2. The motion is denied with respect to production of documents.

3. The motion to compel is granted with respect to interrogatories nos. 1-3. Within fourteen days, further responses shall be provided, limited to caregivers for the time period 2012-to the present. Any discovery produced pursuant to this order shall be used solely for purposes of this litigation and shall be subject to a stipulated protective order, which shall be submitted by the parties within fourteen days.

FootNotes


1. The court reminds the parties that resolution of discovery disputes is available under the informal procedures set forth on the undersigned's court website.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer