McKINNEY-DROBNIS v. MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING RANSTAD NORTH AMERICA, L.P., C-16-6450 MMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170509769
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: May 08, 2017
Summary: SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On April 28, 2017, plaintiffs electronically filed their "Amended Class Action Complaint." Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked `Chambers Copy'." See
Summary: SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On April 28, 2017, plaintiffs electronically filed their "Amended Class Action Complaint." Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked `Chambers Copy'." See ..
More
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
On April 28, 2017, plaintiffs electronically filed their "Amended Class Action Complaint." Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked `Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced document.
The Court has previously advised plaintiffs of their failure to comply with the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders in connection with earlier-filed documents. (See Order, filed February 23, 2017.) Such reminder appears to have had little to no effect on compelling compliance therewith.
Parties are expected to comply with court rules without repeated reminders. Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby advised that the Court will impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any further electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle