Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Apachito v. Social Security Administration, 17-cv-0504 JCH/SMV. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20180131e75 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION JUDITH C. HERRERA , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PF&RD") [Doc. 22], filed on January 10, 2018. On reference by the undersigned, [Doc. 19], the Honorable Stephan M. Vidmar, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. No party has filed objections to the PF&RD, and the time for doin
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PF&RD") [Doc. 22], filed on January 10, 2018. On reference by the undersigned, [Doc. 19], the Honorable Stephan M. Vidmar, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. No party has filed objections to the PF&RD, and the time for doing so has passed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition [Doc. 22] are ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 12] is DENIED. Unless the parties agree on a different time period, Defendant's responsive pleading is due within 14 days. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer