Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. EMPLOYEE EQUITY ADMINISTRATION, INC., 3:12-cv-4494-JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140507840 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 06, 2014
Latest Update: May 06, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOL HEALTHCARE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a CORE Healthcare Centers; SOLNUS TWO, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS THREE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a/Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center; SOLNUS FOUR, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS EIGHT, LLC, a California limi
More

JOINT STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOL HEALTHCARE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a CORE Healthcare Centers; SOLNUS TWO, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS THREE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a/Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center; SOLNUS FOUR, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS EIGHT, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a The Rehabilitation Center of Oakland; SOL MAJER; SHLOMO RECHNITZ

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

JOINT STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Defendants SOL HEALTHCARE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a CORE Healthcare Centers; SOLNUS TWO, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS THREE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a/Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center; SOLNUS FOUR, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS EIGHT, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a The Rehabilitation Center of Oakland; SOL MAJER; and SHLOMO RECHNITZ, (hereinafter, collectively, the "SOL Defendants"), through their respective counsel, that pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between the Plaintiffs and the SOL Defendants, this Court dismiss SOL HEALTHCARE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a CORE Healthcare Centers; SOLNUS TWO, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS THREE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a/ Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center; SOLNUS FOUR, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS EIGHT, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a The Rehabilitation Center of Oakland; SOL MAJER; and SHLOMO RECHNITZ only from this action with prejudice, with all such parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees, and retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the Settlement Agreement if any action is required to enforce the Settlement Agreement after the dismissal with prejudice is entered by this Court. See generally Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 357, 381 (1994); Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1432 (9th Cir. 1995).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I, Kimberly A. Hancock, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between Plaintiffs and the SOL Defendants, and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SOL HEALTHCARE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a CORE Healthcare Centers; SOLNUS TWO, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS THREE, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a/Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center; SOLNUS FOUR, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center; SOLNUS EIGHT, LLC, a California limited liability company, d/b/a The Rehabilitation Center of Oakland; SOL MAJER; and SHLOMO RECHNITZ only are dismissed from this action with prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall expressly retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the Settlement Agreement if any action is required to enforce the Settlement Agreement after the dismissal with prejudice is entered by this Court. See generally Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 357, 381 (1994); Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1432 (9th Cir. 1995).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer