Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Simms, 15-CR-00080-MSK-GPG. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20160427930 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING CHANGE OF PLEA AND FED.R.CIM.P.11 ADVISEMENTS GORDON P. GALLAGHER , Magistrate Judge . This matter came before the Court for a Change of Plea following the filing of unanimous written consent by the parties, to have a United States Magistrate Judge provide advisements and a Recommendation. The Government was represented by Assistant Attorney General, Mark Romley. The Defendant was present on summons with attorney Stephan Schweissing. The Plea Agreement is submitted pursua
More

ORDER REGARDING CHANGE OF PLEA AND FED.R.CIM.P.11 ADVISEMENTS

This matter came before the Court for a Change of Plea following the filing of unanimous written consent by the parties, to have a United States Magistrate Judge provide advisements and a Recommendation.

The Government was represented by Assistant Attorney General, Mark Romley.

The Defendant was present on summons with attorney Stephan Schweissing.

The Plea Agreement is submitted pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A)&(B).

The Defendant was re-arraigned with regard to Count 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 of the Information (Exhibit 3). The Defendant pleads guilty to Counts 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 of the Information.

The Defendant was sworn and advised regarding:

1. The terms and provisions of the proposed plea agreement (Ex. 1);

2. All matters contained in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1);

The Court Finds that:

(1). The Defendant is fully competent to proceed, to enter an informed plea of Guilty to Counts 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 of the Information;

(2). The Defendant understands his right to proceed by way of Indictment;

(3). The Defendant understands the nature of the charges to which he is pleading guilty;

(4). The Defendant understands the possible penalties and the effects and consequences of a plea of guilty;

(5). The Defendant understands the fundamental Constitutional rights that are being waived including Defendant's right to a jury trial and all the rights associated with a trial;

(6). The Defendant's plea of guilty is voluntary and knowingly made;

(7). The Defendant is satisfied with the representation of counsel, has been represented through the course of this proceeding, and has no objection, criticism or complaint a to the representation which Defendant has received.

(8). The Defendant acknowledges and agrees with and to the factual basis and the Court finds that both the charge and plea are supported by an independent basis in fact;

(9). The Defendant understands that the penalty imposed by the sentencing Court will be based, in part, upon the facts stated in the plea agreement and may exceed that which is recommended in it.

(10). Pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the Government intends to dismiss counts I and II of the Indictment.

It is hereby ORDERED:

(1). The Plea Agreement, Statement by Defendant in Advance of Plea of Guilty to Counts 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 of the Information are received.

(2). The Probation Department shall conduct a presentence investigation and submit a presentence report as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32. Defendant shall, with the assistance of counsel, immediately after this hearing or as soon as practicable, make arrangements to participate in the presentence investigation and shall fully cooperate with the Probation Department.

(3). The sentencing hearing is set for July 5, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. before Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Sentencing shall take place at the United States District Court, Wayne Aspinall Federal Building, 400 Rood Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501.

(4). Any motions hearing and/or trial date is vacated. All non-substantive motions are declared moot.

It is RECOMMENDED that:

(1). The Plea and Plea Agreement be accepted.

(2). All filed motions be denied, as moot.

(3). The Government's Motion to dismiss Counts I of the original Information be granted, but the effect of the order stayed until the time of Sentencing.

The parties may object in writing to the findings and recommendations pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(B)(2) within fourteen(14) days.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer