STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

On August 29, 2016 the defendant filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under § 2255. (Docket No. 145.) The next day, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing the government to respond within 60 days of the Order, and the defendant to file a reply brief within 30 days of the government's response. (Docket No. 151.) Pursuant to this Order, the government's response is currently due on Monday, October 31, and the defendant's reply would therefore be due on Wednesday, November 30, 2016.

Counsel for the parties have met and conferred regarding the briefing schedule and, due to the schedules of counsel for both parties, hereby stipulate and jointly request that the schedule be modified as follows:

Given the nature of the defendant's sentence and the specific issues raised in the defendant's motion, the parties do not believe that this brief extension of filing dates poses a risk that the defendant will spend additional time in custody, regardless of the outcome of his motion. Therefore, the parties do not believe that the modified briefing schedule will prejudice the defendant.

Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court adopt the briefing schedule set forth above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, the Court adopts the parties' proposed briefing schedule as follows:

IT IS SO ORDERED.