Tam Vu v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 18-cv-03594-SI. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190405c84
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 54. SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . On April 3, 2019, defendants filed an administrative motion to file under seal documents in connection with a joint discovery dispute letter filed the same day. Dkt. Nos. 53 and 54. Defendants filed a redacted version of the document they wish to file under seal but not an unredacted document. Dkt. No. 54-4. Defendants' administrative motion therefore fails to comply with Local Rule 79-5(d
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 54. SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . On April 3, 2019, defendants filed an administrative motion to file under seal documents in connection with a joint discovery dispute letter filed the same day. Dkt. Nos. 53 and 54. Defendants filed a redacted version of the document they wish to file under seal but not an unredacted document. Dkt. No. 54-4. Defendants' administrative motion therefore fails to comply with Local Rule 79-5(d)..
More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 54.
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On April 3, 2019, defendants filed an administrative motion to file under seal documents in connection with a joint discovery dispute letter filed the same day. Dkt. Nos. 53 and 54. Defendants filed a redacted version of the document they wish to file under seal but not an unredacted document. Dkt. No. 54-4. Defendants' administrative motion therefore fails to comply with Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(D) and is DENIED. Defendants may re-file their motion in compliance with the Local Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
