Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rice v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-00890-CMK. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180712797 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FILE HER CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF 30 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FILE HER CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is requested because Defendant's counsel was recently assigned to this case and will be out of the office the week the briefing is currently due. The additional time requested will enable Defendant to adequately research the issues presented in this case. The current due date is June 28, 2018. The new due date will be July 28, 2018.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer