HIGHSMITH v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, C 16-02823 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160617837
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2016
Summary: REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . In lieu of a response to Geico Casualty Company's pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Geico shall please state by JUNE 21, AT NOON whether the motion to dismiss should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended pleading or if it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the amendments in the reply. In either case, a new briefing sc
Summary: REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . In lieu of a response to Geico Casualty Company's pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Geico shall please state by JUNE 21, AT NOON whether the motion to dismiss should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended pleading or if it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the amendments in the reply. In either case, a new briefing sch..
More
REQUEST FOR RESPONSE RE AMENDED COMPLAINT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
In lieu of a response to Geico Casualty Company's pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Geico shall please state by JUNE 21, AT NOON whether the motion to dismiss should be denied as moot without prejudice to a renewed motion directed at the amended pleading or if it would prefer to continue with the present motion and address the amendments in the reply. In either case, a new briefing schedule and hearing date will be set.
Source: Leagle
