Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Lund, 2:18-CR-00192 TLN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181212984 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The United States of America, by and through Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian A. Fogerty, and defendant Andrew Stephen Lund, by and through counsel Thomas A. Johnson, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. On November 8, 2018, the Court set this case for a status conference on December 13, 2018. ECF No. 6. To date, the government has produced more than 700 pages
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The United States of America, by and through Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian A. Fogerty, and defendant Andrew Stephen Lund, by and through counsel Thomas A. Johnson, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. On November 8, 2018, the Court set this case for a status conference on December 13, 2018. ECF No. 6. To date, the government has produced more than 700 pages of discovery. The government has also made other discovery materials available for inspection by the defendant and defense counsel. Defense counsel seeks additional time to investigate the allegations in the indictment and to continue the review of discovery materials. This investigation is necessary for effective preparation for trial.

2. Counsel for the government and defendant have conferred and respectfully request that the Court vacate the December 13, 2018, status conference, and set the case for a status conference on January 24, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. The parties agree that the interests of justice served by continuing the case to January 24, 2019, and excluding the intervening time under the Speedy Trial Act, outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The parties request that the Court order time excluded from December 13, 2018, through January 24, 2018, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(vi), and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel to investigate and prepare for trial.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The status conference on December 13, 2018 is VACATED, and reset for January 24, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance and exclude the time between December 13, 2018, and January 24, 2019, would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time from December 13, 2018, to and including January 24, 2019, is excluded from the computation of time within which the trial of this case must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and Local Code T-4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer