U.S. v. Woody's Trucking, LLC, CR 17-138-BLG-SPW. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20180514493
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 04, 2018
Latest Update: May 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Defendants Woody's Trucking, LLC, and Donald E. Wood, Jr., moved the Court for an order compelling the disclosure of Kelly Steen's presentence report. (Doc. 103). The Court reserved ruling on the motion until the government produced Steen's presentence report for in camera review. (Doc. 116 at 7). The Court has conducted its in camera review of Steen's presentence report and concluded it does not contain information required to be disclosed under B
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . Defendants Woody's Trucking, LLC, and Donald E. Wood, Jr., moved the Court for an order compelling the disclosure of Kelly Steen's presentence report. (Doc. 103). The Court reserved ruling on the motion until the government produced Steen's presentence report for in camera review. (Doc. 116 at 7). The Court has conducted its in camera review of Steen's presentence report and concluded it does not contain information required to be disclosed under Br..
More
ORDER
SUSAN P. WATTERS, District Judge.
Defendants Woody's Trucking, LLC, and Donald E. Wood, Jr., moved the Court for an order compelling the disclosure of Kelly Steen's presentence report. (Doc. 103). The Court reserved ruling on the motion until the government produced Steen's presentence report for in camera review. (Doc. 116 at 7). The Court has conducted its in camera review of Steen's presentence report and concluded it does not contain information required to be disclosed under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). Accordingly, Steen's presentence report will not be disclosed to the Defendants. The motion to compel production (Doc. 103) is denied.
Source: Leagle