Marks v. Chappel, 11-CV-02458-LHK. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160520993
Visitors: 27
Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE PRO SE FILINGS Re: Dkt. Nos. 66, 67 LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . Petitioner Delaney Geral Marks ("Petitioner"), who is represented by counsel, recently filed two pro se documents. See Dkt. Nos. 66 and 67. In the documents, Petitioner contends that Petitioner is being "failed by attorney and suffering . . . cruelty." Within fourteen days of the date of this Order, Petitioner's counsel are ORDERED to file a response to Petitioner's pro se filings. This response should be
Summary: ORDER RE PRO SE FILINGS Re: Dkt. Nos. 66, 67 LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . Petitioner Delaney Geral Marks ("Petitioner"), who is represented by counsel, recently filed two pro se documents. See Dkt. Nos. 66 and 67. In the documents, Petitioner contends that Petitioner is being "failed by attorney and suffering . . . cruelty." Within fourteen days of the date of this Order, Petitioner's counsel are ORDERED to file a response to Petitioner's pro se filings. This response should be ..
More
ORDER RE PRO SE FILINGS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 66, 67
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Petitioner Delaney Geral Marks ("Petitioner"), who is represented by counsel, recently filed two pro se documents. See Dkt. Nos. 66 and 67. In the documents, Petitioner contends that Petitioner is being "failed by attorney and suffering . . . cruelty." Within fourteen days of the date of this Order, Petitioner's counsel are ORDERED to file a response to Petitioner's pro se filings. This response should be no more than five pages in length.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
