Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Van Aldridge v. Technology and Supply Management, LLC, 2:18-cv-01081-GW-AGR. (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181206890 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . Plaintiffs Van Aldridge and Germain Parra (collectively "Plaintiffs") commenced this civil action on February 8, 2018 against Technology and Supply Management, LLC (" TaSM ") and Scott J. Novak (collectively "Defendants") to obtain damages, civil penalties, and other relief. Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on April 18, 2018 and a Second Amended Complaint July 4, 2018. The Second Amended Complaint alleges, inter alia,
More

STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Van Aldridge and Germain Parra (collectively "Plaintiffs") commenced this civil action on February 8, 2018 against Technology and Supply Management, LLC ("TaSM") and Scott J. Novak (collectively "Defendants") to obtain damages, civil penalties, and other relief. Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on April 18, 2018 and a Second Amended Complaint July 4, 2018. The Second Amended Complaint alleges, inter alia, violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") (29 U.S.C. § 201), the California Labor Code, and the Arizona Wage Act in connection with TaSM's alleged failure to pay wages due to Plaintiffs, and alleges that Defendant Scott J. Novak is liable to Plaintiffs as an employer under the FLSA for monies due to Plaintiffs for alleged violations of the FLSA.

On October 22, 2018, the Parties attended mediation and agreed to settle the dispute.

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, now jointly request that the Court enter this Stipulated Final Judgment and Order ("Stipulated Judgment").

I. FINDINGS

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter of this action.

2. The Parties agree to entry of this Stipulated Judgment, without adjudication of the remaining issues of fact or law pleaded in the Second Amended Complaint, to settle and resolve all matters in dispute arising from the conduct alleged in the Second Amended Complaint to the date this Stipulated Judgment is entered. (A copy of the Settlement Agreement is annexed hereto and made a part hereof.)

3. Defendants neither admit nor deny any allegations in the Second Amended Complaint, except as stated in this Stipulated Judgment, including the annexed Settlement Agreement. For purposes of this Stipulated Judgment, Defendants admit the facts necessary to establish the Court's jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of this action.

4. As part of the settlement reached by the Parties, Defendant TaSM agreed to pay Plaintiff Aldridge a gross settlement amount of $8,311.58 and Plaintiff Parra the gross settlement amount of $2,824.20 which represented the amount of accrued but unused Paid Time Off Plaintiffs had at the time their employment terminated, which sums have been tendered and paid to Plaintiffs by TaSM.

5. As further part of the settlement reached by the Parties, the Parties agreed to entry of this Stipulated Judgment.

II. ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. A judgment for monetary relief and damages is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant TaSM as follows:

a. In favor of Plaintiff Aldridge in the amount of $16,900; and b. In favor of Plaintiff Parra in the amount of $15,600.

2. A judgment of dismissal with prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant Scott J. Novak for all claims and allegations in the Second Amended Complaint.

3. Within 14 days of entry of this Stipulated Order, counsel for Plaintiffs may petition the Court for attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action. Further, a supplemental fee petition may be filed for attorneys' fees and costs incurred for necessary tasks following the filing of the aforementioned fee petition. The briefing on any fee petition filed in this action will be governed by the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable local and chamber rules.

4. Any attorneys' fees or costs awarded in this matter will be included in a Final Judgment entered by this Court.

5. This Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Stipulated Order. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]

SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES

DATED: _________________ ____________________________________ Van Aldridge DATED: _________________ ____________________________________ Germain Parra DATED: _________________ ____________________________________ Scott J. Novak DATED: November 25, 2018 Technology and Supply Management, LLC By: _________________________________ Its: President

APPROVED AS TO FORM

DATED: _________________ PEREZ VAUGHN & FEASBY Inc. ____________________________________ Christopher W. Rowlett Attorneys for Plaintiffs LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. JOENS DATED: _________________ ____________________________________ Timothy L. Joens Attorneys for Defendants

JUDGMENT AND ORDER

IT IS SO ADJUDGED AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer