Rossy v. City of Bishop, 1:17-cv-01244-LJO-SAB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180406a28
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On April 3, 2018, District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill issued an order denying Defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for a more definite statement. (ECF No. 18.) Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants' responsive pleading is due within fourteen days of the entry of the order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERE
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On April 3, 2018, District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill issued an order denying Defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for a more definite statement. (ECF No. 18.) Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants' responsive pleading is due within fourteen days of the entry of the order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED..
More
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
On April 3, 2018, District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill issued an order denying Defendants' motion to dismiss and motion for a more definite statement. (ECF No. 18.) Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants' responsive pleading is due within fourteen days of the entry of the order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a responsive pleading on or before April 17, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
