Filed: Jan. 30, 2010
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2010
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND ORDERING FURTHER DISCLOSURES (ECF No. 48) ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Debra Berry ("Plaintiff") is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 2000d. On January 4, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to compel, requesting sanctions and additional deposition testimony. (ECF No. 48.) The Court held a hea
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND ORDERING FURTHER DISCLOSURES (ECF No. 48) ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Debra Berry ("Plaintiff") is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 2000d. On January 4, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to compel, requesting sanctions and additional deposition testimony. (ECF No. 48.) The Court held a hear..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND ORDERING FURTHER DISCLOSURES
(ECF No. 48)
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Debra Berry ("Plaintiff") is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 2000d.
On January 4, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to compel, requesting sanctions and additional deposition testimony. (ECF No. 48.) The Court held a hearing on January 25, 2018. (ECF No. 59.) Plaintiff appeared telephonically and Ms. Kellie M. Murphy, attorney for Defendants, appeared telephonically.
For the reasons stated on the record, Defendants' motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff is ordered within thirty (30) days from the date of this order to provide defendants the following in writing and under oath:
1. A list of all cases Plaintiff was involved in within the last 10 years, including, the case name, case number, and a brief description of the subject matter;
2. A written statement as to whether Plaintiff claims emotional distress damages, and if so the specific basis of that claim1; and
3. A statement stating whether Plaintiff has any documents that she looked at during her deposition, which have not already been provided to defendants. If so, describe the documents.
Defendants have leave to file a supplement to their motion to compel requesting further information within 14 days after receipt of Plaintiff's submission.
Also as discussed on the record, the Court also finds good cause to further modify the Scheduling Order, (ECF Nos. 28, 47). The Court makes this modification with the understanding that the parties will participate in a settlement conference to be set in May 2019. Accordingly, the schedule in this action is further modified as follows:
Current Date New Date
Non-Expert Disclosure November 16, 2018 April 15, 2019
Initial Expert Disclosure: February 25, 2019 June 17, 2019
Expert Rebuttal/Supplemental: March 25, 2019 July 15, 2019
Expert Discovery Cut-off: April 29, 2019 August 12, 2019
Non-Dispositive Motion Filing: May 6, 2019 August 26, 2019
Dispositive Motion Filing: May 28, 2019 September 9, 2019
Dispositive Motion Hearing: June 27, 2019 October 4, 2019
Pretrial Conference: August 8, 2019 December 6, 2019
Jury Trial: November 5, 2019 March 3, 2020
IT IS SO ORDERED.
