Ellesbury v. Fernandez, 2:18-cv-2744 KJM KJN P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191122a33
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the court is plaintiff's request for subpoenas. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff requests that the Clerk of the Court issue subpoenas for plaintiff's witnesses: Officer Basile, Officer Lee, Office Austin and Dr. Win. It appears that plaintiff is requesting that these witnesses be subpoenaed to testify at trial. No trial date has been set in this action. For this reason, plaintiff's request for subpoenas for trial witnesses is premature. Ac
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the court is plaintiff's request for subpoenas. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff requests that the Clerk of the Court issue subpoenas for plaintiff's witnesses: Officer Basile, Officer Lee, Office Austin and Dr. Win. It appears that plaintiff is requesting that these witnesses be subpoenaed to testify at trial. No trial date has been set in this action. For this reason, plaintiff's request for subpoenas for trial witnesses is premature. Acc..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is plaintiff's request for subpoenas. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff requests that the Clerk of the Court issue subpoenas for plaintiff's witnesses: Officer Basile, Officer Lee, Office Austin and Dr. Win. It appears that plaintiff is requesting that these witnesses be subpoenaed to testify at trial.
No trial date has been set in this action. For this reason, plaintiff's request for subpoenas for trial witnesses is premature. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for subpoenas (ECF No. 47) is denied without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
