Friends of Animals v. Silvey, 3:18-cv-00043-RCJ-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180425813
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2018
Summary: JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO RESOLVE RECORD DISPUTES ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Jill Silvey, in her official capacity as the Elko District Office Manager, and the United States Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") (collectively, "Federal Defendants") and Friends of Animals ("Plaintiff") submit the following modification to the current schedule for the above-captioned case. The parties are currently conferring to informally resolve any disputes regarding the Admini
Summary: JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO RESOLVE RECORD DISPUTES ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Jill Silvey, in her official capacity as the Elko District Office Manager, and the United States Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") (collectively, "Federal Defendants") and Friends of Animals ("Plaintiff") submit the following modification to the current schedule for the above-captioned case. The parties are currently conferring to informally resolve any disputes regarding the Adminis..
More
JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO RESOLVE RECORD DISPUTES
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Jill Silvey, in her official capacity as the Elko District Office Manager, and the United States Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") (collectively, "Federal Defendants") and Friends of Animals ("Plaintiff") submit the following modification to the current schedule for the above-captioned case.
The parties are currently conferring to informally resolve any disputes regarding the Administrative Record. In light of the volume of the record and documents under dispute, the parties hereby request a modest extension to modify the scheduling order in order to ensure the parties' ability to adequately and meaningfully resolve any disputes without seeking Court intervention.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and modify the remaining deadlines in the scheduling order (ECF No. 15) as follows:
A. Administrative Record
i. The parties shall consult about any concerns with the Administrative Record, and attempt to informally resolve any disputes regarding the Administrative Record no later than March 30, 2018.
ii. Plaintiff shall file any Motion to Supplement the Record no later than April 6, 2018.
iii. Parties shall file any Motion to Amend or Supplement the Pleadings no later than April 6, 2018.
B. Briefing on the Merits
i. Plaintiff shall file its Opening Brief within 14 days after resolution of any motions regarding the contents of the Administrative Record, as provided in paragraph A(iv). If no motions are filed under paragraph A(iv), Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than May 3, 2018.
ii. Federal Defendants shall file their combined Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment no later than May 24, 2018.
iii. Plaintiff shall file its combined Response to Federal Defendants' Cross-Motion and Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment no later than June 7, 2018.
iv. Federal Defendants shall file their Reply in support of their Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment no later than June 21, 2018.
The parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and set the proposed deadlines in the above-captioned case. If the Court determines that a hearing on the Summary Judgment Motions would aid the Court, the parties request that the Court schedule oral argument as expeditiously as possible after briefing has been concluded.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
