CRESPIN v. COLVIN, 15-cv-00649-WYD. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150914525
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL , Senior District Judge . Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand (ECF No. 15), seeking entry of judgment and a remand for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), is GRANTED. The final decision of the agency is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the agency will reconsider Plaintiff's claim de novo and instruct the ALJ to further e
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL , Senior District Judge . Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand (ECF No. 15), seeking entry of judgment and a remand for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), is GRANTED. The final decision of the agency is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the agency will reconsider Plaintiff's claim de novo and instruct the ALJ to further ev..
More
ORDER
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Senior District Judge.
Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand (ECF No. 15), seeking entry of judgment and a remand for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is GRANTED. The final decision of the agency is REVERSED and the case REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the agency will reconsider Plaintiff's claim de novo and instruct the ALJ to further evaluate Plaintiff's maximum residual functional capacity (20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545, 416.945, and Social Security Rulings ("SSR") 96-8p, 96-9p), and in so doing, evaluate the opinion of Gerald I. Bell, M.D., explaining the reasons for the weight given to this opinion (20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527(e), 416.927(e) and SSR 96-6p); and if warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a medical expert and obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert at step five of the sequential evaluation process (20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1566, 416.966, and SSR 00-4p).
The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).
Source: Leagle
