Black v. Berryhill, 18-cv-02031-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180823b57
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME Re: Dkt. No. 18 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiff Black, who is proceeding pro se, seeks an extension of time to file her response or opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 18. That motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response or opposition is now due, per her request, on September 12, 2018. Defendant's reply is due on September 19, 2018. The matter will be taken under submission and determined on the papers; no hearing
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME Re: Dkt. No. 18 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiff Black, who is proceeding pro se, seeks an extension of time to file her response or opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 18. That motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response or opposition is now due, per her request, on September 12, 2018. Defendant's reply is due on September 19, 2018. The matter will be taken under submission and determined on the papers; no hearing w..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME
Re: Dkt. No. 18
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Black, who is proceeding pro se, seeks an extension of time to file her response or opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 18.
That motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response or opposition is now due, per her request, on September 12, 2018. Defendant's reply is due on September 19, 2018. The matter will be taken under submission and determined on the papers; no hearing will be set.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
