Filed: May 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14143 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14143 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00631-JSM-MAP-15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROCKE WILLIAM DILBERT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 20, 2013) Before CARNES, BARKETT and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Andres Oliveros, appointed cou
Summary: Case: 12-14143 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14143 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00631-JSM-MAP-15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROCKE WILLIAM DILBERT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 20, 2013) Before CARNES, BARKETT and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Andres Oliveros, appointed coun..
More
Case: 12-14143 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14143
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00631-JSM-MAP-15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROCKE WILLIAM DILBERT,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(May 20, 2013)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Andres Oliveros, appointed counsel for Rocke Dilbert in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
Case: 12-14143 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 2 of 2
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744–45,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dilbert’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2