Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc., 2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160526c95 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's Motion to Seal Opposition to Motion to Reconsider Assert Freeze Order and Exhibit 22 (ECF NO. 985). To date, no opposition has been filed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relief defendants must file a response showing cause, by June 3, 2016, why Exhibit 22 (ECF No. 984-25) and the portions of the FTC's memorandum discussing that Exhibit should remain sealed.

ORDER

Before the court is Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's Motion to Seal Opposition to Motion to Reconsider Assert Freeze Order and Exhibit 22 (ECF NO. 985). To date, no opposition has been filed.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relief defendants must file a response showing cause, by June 3, 2016, why Exhibit 22 (ECF No. 984-25) and the portions of the FTC's memorandum discussing that Exhibit should remain sealed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer