Acosta v. Moua, 17-cv-00480-DAD-SAB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170525902
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 23, 2017
Latest Update: May 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WINDMILL STATION LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Acosta ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Windmill Station LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have an 18-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WINDMILL STATION LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Acosta ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Windmill Station LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have an 18-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WINDMILL STATION LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Acosta ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Windmill Station LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have an 18-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or before June 13, 2017.
The parties previously entered into an initial stipulation extending Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint by 28 days.
This stipulation will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order.
The reason for the present extension is that the parties are in the midst of negotiating a resolution of this matter.
Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this document on his behalf.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following deadline applies:
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
